![]() ![]() |
| Nuno Peralta |
Jan 5 2007, 02:05 AM
Post
#1
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 151 Joined: 1-January 07 From: Portugal Member No.: 1,021 |
disable 3 file tranfering limit
it is possible in Windows Live Messenger??? it is so wished by me.... lol sorry my english...... and.. i love StuffPlug =) -------------------- |
| auzak |
Jan 16 2007, 02:34 AM
Post
#2
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 105 Joined: 12-January 07 Member No.: 1,299 |
agreed.. the 3 file transfer limitation is a bother..
|
| atmlord |
Jan 16 2007, 12:50 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-January 07 Member No.: 1,187 |
this is a must!
|
| xJ + |
Jan 17 2007, 04:09 PM
Post
#4
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 15 Joined: 24-November 06 From: SG Member No.: 333 |
It's indeed a great feature to be added to stuffplug 3 when those users aren't using NTFS system.
However, I think in the near future, probably after everyone has got Vista, when all users changed to a newer PC, all of them will be using NTFS system and by then it would be useless to have that. To add on, having that particular feature is brilliant, but wouldn't it eat up the connection speed when there are more then 3 files downloading/uploading simultaneously? Even if there's an option to disable it, when it's implemented, I, personally, think that if let's say you, TB, really implement it, wouldn't it be even better to let users to have a speed limit for it, like what those torrent clients have? That's just my suggestion if that particular feature is implemented in the future. To end off, even if you only implement this particular feature without the speed control, it'd still be unique having that, that would also save time. And, erm, my apology if I've asked too much.. (: This post has been edited by xJ +: Jan 17 2007, 04:10 PM -------------------- |
| Annuix |
Jan 17 2007, 04:15 PM
Post
#5
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 20-November 06 From: United Kingdom (Scotland) Member No.: 250 |
Thats okay, I'm currently on a FAT32 file system, (which doesn't allow me to use sharing folders, which is gay)
-------------------- ![]() |
| Sieg_Serpanim |
Jan 17 2007, 08:08 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 14 Joined: 23-November 06 Member No.: 323 |
"convert c : /fs:ntfs" on the Cmd, and you won't be a Gay Ung33k anymore
Or maybe you're on Linux ? |
| Annuix |
Jan 17 2007, 10:51 PM
Post
#7
|
![]() Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 20-November 06 From: United Kingdom (Scotland) Member No.: 250 |
No, it's standard with this laptop, I don't know why. I don't use sharing folders, and FAT32 does me no harm.
This post has been edited by Annuix: Jan 17 2007, 10:52 PM -------------------- ![]() |
| Matty |
Feb 7 2007, 06:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: New Members Posts: 118 Joined: 21-January 07 From: England Member No.: 1,423 |
I personally dont send many files, infact I might send one a month but disabling the transfer limit might be alright if I end up sendin things to people more often
|
| TheBlasphemer |
Mar 1 2007, 11:38 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Root Admin Posts: 270 Joined: 27-May 06 Member No.: 1 |
Will be in next release.
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:43 PM |